OK, so I’ll get straight to the point: I don’t see the point of YouTube Education. That may be due to my own context or our way of going about things, but I’ll try to explain where I’m coming from and I’m happy to be proven wrong.
This sums it up for me, it’s the warning you get once signed up:
This statement is spot on, but, if it’s true, then why do we need YouTube Edu? This statement applies to YouTube and the whole entire galactic content of the web, doesn’t it? While we’re at it, it also applies to any educational resource – DVDs, Video, Cassettes, Radio, Pictures, News….
Before I go any further, I’d like to point out that I think YouTube content is great for the classroom. In fact, I use it often. But…
For me, there are a number of issues with this intro. Firstly, teachers have been safety using video in classrooms for years. Secondly, although you get access to all of the educational content on YouTube Edu for free, a) YouTube is free anyway and b) who decides what is educational content. Some examples:
After stealing an idea from good friend and great geographer Alan Parkinson, I’ve been using the clip above for years. Why? To point out the reliability of claims and data. Can a claim that only sampled 356 women be trusted? This lesson can be applied to data collection, presentation and analysis to great effect.
The clip above is great for exploring industrial change and helping young people to develop a sense of place, then encouraging them to write about it. I got the idea of using this sort of video from Noel Jenkins, and they are very effective at starting conversations.
The impact of an MEDC volcanic eruption? Would this be seen as educational content by YouTube edu?
The earthquake in New Zealand happening now – pupils could create a narration for example. How quickly can YouTube Edu respond? Although, with this example I am more likely to use sites like the BBC, use radio and other newspaper sites.
Sorry, just had to put this bad boy in here Couldn’t find it on YouTube Edu despite it (and another other 6 videos) winning a prize from Google in an educational video competition. (this could be on there, so do feel free to shoot me down if it is or there are plan to include such teacher generated content)
YouTube Edu currently offers this as geographical content:
My point? While I admire Google for trying, the only real people that should be making decisions on what is useful educational content is teachers. Teachers who understand their own educational context, the learning styles of young people and their classroom.
I think that it’s the wrong argument to have, but admit that it is a start.
How do we access YouTube in the classroom (with a classic Muppets tune):
That and having persuasive, learning focuses conversations with the right people to move toward unblocking or filtered access. From the short experience on the mobile device adventure, we’ve found that young people on the whole can be trusted. It’s the staff you have to worry about….
This post is based upon a quick exploration of YouTube Edu and I know that content and features will be added. However, YouTube is an excellent resource for teachers, YouTube Edu?……..
What we need? Teachers to be trusted to identify and use useful content available on the internet.